|
Defensive Fleet Request
|
|
| LomenRyuun | Date: Thursday, 11 Nov 2010, 6:06 PM | Message # 1 |
 Lieutenant general
Group: Users
Messages: 696
Status: Offline
| In keeping with good Imperial policies and being willing to be the first to show more than lip service to the good Senator Oriel's new legislation, Druckwenwell would like to sell off its Acclamator and Venator and, with the proceeds, purchase the following: 3x Carrack light cruisers
1x Lancer frigate
1x EF76 Nebulon-B frigate As mentioned by Senator Oriel, the sale of a single Venator would be enough to purchase eight to ten vessels of smaller size, so it should more than cover the expenses.
Lomen Ryuun
Senator, Doldur Sector
Senator, Druckenwell
Representative, Monor II (10 BBY - 9 BBY)
Representative, Geridard
Representative, Boranall
Representative, Therenor Prime
Vice-chairman, Defense Committee (Temporarily suspended)
Controlling Shareholder - Druckenwell Arms Corporation
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Friday, 12 Nov 2010, 7:40 AM | Message # 2 |
 Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| A query: are the Carracks in their normal configuration, or the anti-starfighter configuration? Either way (but for different reasons), I think one of them should go. Combined with the other support vessels, and depending on the configuration, I feel three of them would either be a bit too much anti-starfighter firepower or a bit too much anti-capital ship firepower. But, just for clarification, it'd be good to know what the configuration is.
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| LomenRyuun | Date: Saturday, 13 Nov 2010, 12:02 PM | Message # 3 |
|
Lieutenant general
Group: Users
Messages: 696
Status: Offline
| The configuration is standard. The Lancer is the primary anti-starfighter.
Lomen Ryuun
Senator, Doldur Sector
Senator, Druckenwell
Representative, Monor II (10 BBY - 9 BBY)
Representative, Geridard
Representative, Boranall
Representative, Therenor Prime
Vice-chairman, Defense Committee (Temporarily suspended)
Controlling Shareholder - Druckenwell Arms Corporation
|
| |
| |
| OrionKarath | Date: Saturday, 13 Nov 2010, 6:45 PM | Message # 4 |
 Lieutenant general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 612
Status: Offline
| I'm good with the numbers, but on a technical note...the Lancer Frigate isn't introduced for another decade. Are you wanting the similar, albeit inferior, Tartan Patrol Cruiser? It's the Lancer's predecessor.
Orion Karath
Manager from June 2009 to Present, Administrator from December 2011 to Present
My posts here, pre-2009 archives here
|
| |
| |
| LomenRyuun | Date: Saturday, 13 Nov 2010, 7:08 PM | Message # 5 |
|
Lieutenant general
Group: Users
Messages: 696
Status: Offline
| My mistake there. The Tartan is acceptable.
Lomen Ryuun
Senator, Doldur Sector
Senator, Druckenwell
Representative, Monor II (10 BBY - 9 BBY)
Representative, Geridard
Representative, Boranall
Representative, Therenor Prime
Vice-chairman, Defense Committee (Temporarily suspended)
Controlling Shareholder - Druckenwell Arms Corporation
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Friday, 19 Nov 2010, 4:00 PM | Message # 6 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| In that case, as Marv Albert would say, "Yes, aaaaaaaaaand.. it's APPROVED." 2 Carrack-class Cruisers
1 Tartan-class Patrol Cruiser
1 EF76 Nebulon-B Frigate
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
