|
Stark Request
|
|
| Alyn_Stark | Date: Sunday, 12 Aug 2012, 5:51 PM | Message # 1 |
 Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Status: Offline
| I'm not actually sure I need to request this, and I was actually trying to go a month without but I'm being on the safe side, but I'd like to upgrade some of the internal defense turrets within Castle Stark with modified sleep inducers, as well as certain turrets to spray nerve gas.
Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Sunday, 12 Aug 2012, 8:38 PM | Message # 2 |
 Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| Sleep inducer isn't a term I'm familiar with. But if you mean standard sonic weaponry, I'm fine with that. If the government building in Murmamn City can have sonic turrets on it, seems reasonable to me Stark's fortress should, too. And speaking of Murmamn City, a first-line of sonic defenses would be a good, non-lethal way to keep intruders out. Just a thought. I APPROVE, though I'm wary of the nerve gas. Chemical agents haven't generally been approved, and when they have, it's usually been for non-NPC character-on-character fights, rather than mass-use. I'll hold back though until I've heard Karth's and Jaron's opinions.
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| Alyn_Stark | Date: Monday, 13 Aug 2012, 4:36 PM | Message # 3 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Status: Offline
| I should clarify; the sleep inducers are indeed a form of sonic weaponry and when I speak of chemical agents, I don't mean kill-on-contact gas; rather disabling, disorienting gas that causes spasms of limbs, etc.
Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Sunday, 19 Aug 2012, 7:17 PM | Message # 4 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| Even being non-lethal—perhaps especially being non-lethal—chemical agents, toxins, etc. usually haven't been approved except for one-on-one use. It'd be awfully cheap, for instance, to see an advancing army of thousands put to sleep in one fell swoop, as some people would probably do. A chemical agent used on hundreds of people (even dozens of people, really), even if it's non-lethal, would qualify as "catastrophic destruction" under Rule 2.1 as I personally interpret the rule. But I admit I have a pretty tight definition of "catastrophic destruction."
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| Alyn_Stark | Date: Thursday, 23 Aug 2012, 12:08 PM | Message # 5 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Status: Offline
| Fair enough. We can nix the chemical agents then.
Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Sunday, 26 Aug 2012, 5:38 PM | Message # 6 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| Then it looks like you're APPROVED.
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
