MainMy profileRegistrationLog outLogin
Saturday
28.12.2024
4:49 PM
| RSS Main
[New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Archive - read only
Fowlkes Outer Rim Planetary Defense Plan
Tremaine_FowlkesDate: Sunday, 01 Mar 2009, 5:08 PM | Message # 1
Colonel general
Group: Users
Messages: 881
Awards: 0
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline
In addition to the expansion of the holonet to the Outer Rim, I would like to propose a bill that would help the member worlds in the Outer Rim as well. According to the research I have made on New Republic defense all over the galaxy, obviously the defense of the worlds in the Outer Rim is not that much. The New Republic cannot send a fleet every time an attack happens on a member world in the Outer Rim, and some of the time it may be too late to prevent an attack or to even stop the aftermath from becoming worse. So I suggest that we strengthen the defense of the member worlds in the Outer Rim. How? I would like to propose that we use some of New Republic budget money to invest into the expansion and the training of the planetary forces of the member worlds across the Outer Rim. This bill not only will help the planetary forces across the Outer Rim, but also the companies that resides within to manufacture weapons, ships, and vehicles for the member worlds. It would help the struggling companies to pull out of finance troubles as well. This bill requires the spending of 4.2% of the entire Republic budget. Based on the budget first proposed by the Senate a long while ago, here’s how it works:

DECREASED FUNDING
Bureau of Agronomic Research -0.7%
Colony Authority -0.7%
Extragalactic Society -0.7%
NR Council Research -0.7%
Department of R&D -0.7%
NR Reference Service -0.7%

I believe this bill would help in the Outer Rim defense a lot more than what we have now. This will not only strengthen New Republic armed forces, but also strengthen the planetary forces in defending the homeworlds against the Remnant and other threats. I think this would benefit the worlds in being able to fend off the attackers, or at least hold them off until the New Republic armed forces arrive. If anyone have questions, please do not hesitate to ask.

Tremaine Fowlkes,
Senator of Mowgle


Tremaine Fowlkes
Senator of Telos IV


Message edited by Tremaine_Fowlkes - Sunday, 01 Mar 2009, 5:34 PM
 
Ilanah_ThanatosDate: Sunday, 01 Mar 2009, 5:39 PM | Message # 2
Colonel general
Group: Users
Messages: 891
Awards: 3
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
For obvious reasons, I am inclined to agree with Senator Fowlkes. The obvious reasons being that even the beings in the outer rim need the ability to defend themselves and their homes, as well as need and deserve the protection of the Republic.

Ilanah Thanatos
Senator of Chandrila


Ilanah R. Thanatos
Senator of Chandrila
 
DannilBoVarDate: Monday, 02 Mar 2009, 4:10 PM | Message # 3
Major
Group: Users
Messages: 84
Awards: 0
Reputation: 1
Status: Offline
"With respect, Senator Fowlkes, I was under the impression that the Colony Authority was a separate body not under New Republic management. While they work in close proximity to our Scout Services, they are a separate autonomy of which we have no authority, and can't 'cut spending'. However, if I am in error, I apologize.

Furthermore, I find it disconcerting that the Extragalactic Society is taking another budget cut; considering that the department recently suffered a budget loss to allow for the tax cut that the esteemed Chief of State offered (of which I assure you we are most appreciative of). Therefore, if the budget could be amended to a more workable degree, then the InterGalactic Mining Core would be interested in the development of this bill.

I also am particularly perturbed by the budget loss to the Department of Research & Development. As you will all recall, this department during the Rebellion allowed us to stay one step ahead of the Empire. With the ever present threat of the Imperial Remnant, I'm not entirely sure that this advantage should be something we are looking to scuttle.

Effectively, my ire with this bill consists of the specific departments which Senator Fowlkes wishes to cut. Departments which I would insist are still priorities within the Republic, and should be considered carefully. However, as stated before, I am still very much interested in this proposal. I have one question, however: Where will the New Republic focus it's training on primarily? I would deduce that those planets closest to Imperial space should be the focus of the training program; effective buffers for any impending Imperial conquest. Thank you esteemed Senators and Representatives for allowing me to speak today."


-----------
Dannil Bo'Var
Representative
InterGalactic Mining Core and Subsidiaries


Message edited by DannilBoVar - Monday, 02 Mar 2009, 4:11 PM
 
Senator_CambristDate: Tuesday, 03 Mar 2009, 8:20 PM | Message # 4
Lieutenant general
Group: Users
Messages: 761
Awards: 6
Reputation: -5
Status: Offline
I agree with the entirety of Representative Bo'var's remarks (with the exception of his reference to the Colony Authority which, if I may correct him, is in fact under the financial purview of the Senate). However, I must disagree with my colleague even more strenuously; it seems impractical to me to be slashing these programs unnecessarily when private banks are perfectly capable of making the loans and investments that Senator Fowlkes has suggested, with no cost to the New Republic.

Allowing private, New Republic banks to facilitate these funds would be beneficial not simply for the "obvious reasons" (that it's good for our economy and our businesses), but that private banks will better assess the risk of these loans before making them, rather than simply throwing money at the poorest worlds in the galaxy, most of whom being unlikely to repay the debt. And what of those worlds who cannot afford their own defense, you might ask? Those are servile planets indeed, with whom the Republic should not be concerned or affiliated. That said, I oppose this measure.

Senator Cambrist, Brentaal
Chairman of the Commerce Council


 
Eli_FitzgeraldDate: Friday, 06 Mar 2009, 0:06 AM | Message # 5
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 355
Awards: 1
Reputation: 6
Status: Offline
I would contend to Senator Cambrist that to suggest that "those worlds who cannot afford their own defense" are "servile," and that the Republic should "not be concerned or affiliated" with them is not exactly in the spirit of the Declaration of a New Republic, which stated the intention of this government to "provide for common peace and prosperty, and to secure liberty for all beings." I would ask the Senator to choose his words more carefully, and not to condemn an entire people as worthless simply because of their economic status; there are no beings in this galaxy that the New Republic should "not be concerned or affiliated" with, as long as they aspire for freedom, opportunity and self determination.

However, with regard to this bill, I do have to agree that private banks would be a more favorable alternative to such a massive government spending program, which in its current form would no doubt require new bureaucracy to oversee the funds and the hundreds of worlds concerned (the cost of which I do not believe Senator Fowlkes has included in his estimates, not to mention the cost of training and equipping these new forces). I do admire Senator Fowlkes for opposing tax increases to fund this measure―because ultimately it is through cutting taxes that planets can keep and spend their own money on defenses―but I do not believe that cutting so many programs is necessary when, as aforementioned, the funding you've proposed can be provided by private banks instead.

For example, I know for a fact that the Ralltiir Central Bank would be quite willing to work with Outer Rim worlds interested in loans for defenses and development, and I'm sure that it is not alone in that respect. But even if there are planets who, as Senator Cambrist mentioned, "cannot afford their own defense," I would be willing to use the New Republic Bank as a lender-of-last-resort, but I would prefer (and I think Outer Rim planets would also prefer) such instances be considered on a case-by-case basis, rather than through an omnibus bill. Therefore, I vote against the bill, though I support its intent.

Eli Fitzgerald
Chief of State


Eli Fitzgerald
Senator of Ralltiir (10 BBY—Present)

"I was elected to do some flamethrowing in the Senate. To a light a fire under those Senators and make it hot for them."
 
Exar_RayDate: Saturday, 07 Mar 2009, 3:20 PM | Message # 6
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 353
Awards: 0
Reputation: 5
Status: Offline
While I thank the good Senator for his good will in protecting those within the Outer Rim planets, however as the Chief of State has laid out, that we should handle the planets on a case-by-case basis. All these budget cuts the Senator of Mowgle has proposed, are exaggerated at best. There would be no way I would support such a bill with such sloppy numbers thrown together just to put up money for funding. We should meet these planets half-way atleast if they do desire protection. Therefore, I must vote against this bill.

Exar Ray
Senator of Dantooine


 
Simon_LeviDate: Saturday, 07 Mar 2009, 7:07 PM | Message # 7
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 395
Awards: 3
Reputation: -6
Status: Offline
This bill would be massively costly and would hit the overall budget of the New Republic a great deal. I would agree somewhat that worlds should look to their own defense though rather than depending on money from the central government totally for defense, a sovereign planet should not need fiscal incentive to defend its people.. As I believe this bill has been effectively dissected already, I vote against this measure.

Moff of the Tammuz Sector
 
Jory_CarsonDate: Tuesday, 10 Mar 2009, 7:27 PM | Message # 8
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 317
Awards: 1
Reputation: 7
Status: Offline
“I think, that it has been established that this motion is not entirely beneficial to the New
Republic. While I agree that protecting outlier worlds is of utmost importance to the New Republic and all who call themselves free beings, and in fact agree that these worlds are assuredly not ‘servile’ I cannot stress enough that to slash the bottom line on these, already heavily taxed programs would be, as the saying goes, ‘the last nail in their respective coffins’.

“I am afraid that I must stand against this bill.”

 
DannilBoVarDate: Thursday, 12 Mar 2009, 10:29 AM | Message # 9
Major
Group: Users
Messages: 84
Awards: 0
Reputation: 1
Status: Offline
In light of the recent findings and after review, the InterGalactic Mining Core will officially be moving against this motion citing the arguments aforementioned. Although we commend the good Senator from Mowgle for his attempt and for his clearly humanistic and democratic endeavours.

-----------
Dannil Bo'Var
Representative
InterGalactic Mining Core and Subsidiaries
 
Cul-utaanForteDate: Thursday, 12 Mar 2009, 1:56 PM | Message # 10
Colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 150
Awards: 0
Reputation: -10
Status: Offline
I believe this legislation is meant in the best interest, and focus' on an extremely important issue, the Outer Rim. I just feel however, that this bill is not thought through entirely. Thus I must vote, Against. I will look forward though to possibly working with you, Senator Fowlkes, on future Outer Rim legislation.

General Cul'utaan'forte
Forte's Legion
 
Eli_FitzgeraldDate: Friday, 13 Mar 2009, 6:59 PM | Message # 11
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 355
Awards: 1
Reputation: 6
Status: Offline
The vote is closed, and the bill is defeated by a margin of 7 to 2.

Eli Fitzgerald
Chief of State


Eli Fitzgerald
Senator of Ralltiir (10 BBY—Present)

"I was elected to do some flamethrowing in the Senate. To a light a fire under those Senators and make it hot for them."
 
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Search:


Copyright MyCorp © 2024
Create a free website with uCoz