MainMy profileRegistrationLog outLogin
Monday
6.1.2025
12:28 PM
| RSS Main
[New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Archive - read only
Memorandum for Justice Lamar Inosanto
Kalek_HanneDate: Tuesday, 03 Nov 2009, 0:59 AM | Message # 1
Private
Group: Users
Messages: 7
Awards: 0
Reputation: -1
Status: Offline
500 Republica
Coruscant
Personal Residence of Kalek Hanne

Memorandum for: Lamar Inosanto
Justice of the Court
Subject: Corellia v. The New Republic

Your Honor,
While my status as newly appointed Chairman and Managing Director of TriNebulon News is highly known, I can submit my still standing certification as an Attorny at Law if need be. Now, on to business.. my clients, the Government of Corellia and Senator Orion Karath, bring a case against the New Republic concerning the Twin Worlds Resolution. Aside from its lack of proper phrasing (an insult to the culture of the Corellian people), we believe that such a resolution and intrusion upon Planetary Rights is a violation of the Common Charter and thus an illegal action. While this case is being heard, I request an injunction be enforced to the Twin Worlds Resolution, until the legality of such a measure can be settled.

 
Lamar_InosantoDate: Tuesday, 03 Nov 2009, 1:19 AM | Message # 2
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 22
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Before I rule on the matter, is Mr. Hanne aware that his client, Senator Karath, declared his support for the resolution that you are now seeking to block? This is not a comment on the merits of the case, one way or another, but perhaps you can clarify this before we proceed. I am wary of frivolous lawsuits in my court.

Lamar Inosanto
Attorney at Law
 
Kalek_HanneDate: Tuesday, 03 Nov 2009, 1:25 AM | Message # 3
Private
Group: Users
Messages: 7
Awards: 0
Reputation: -1
Status: Offline
My apologies Your Honor, as this was sent to your office, Senator Karath withdrew his personal involvement in this case, and will only be involved as necesarry as a member of the Corellian Government.
 
Lamar_InosantoDate: Tuesday, 03 Nov 2009, 1:34 AM | Message # 4
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 22
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Am I to understand then, Mr. Hanne, that the Corellian government's official position is that they are opposed to the resolution? You can understand why I would be confused on this matter, since I presume that a Senator generally votes in accordance with the wishes of the government and people that he represents. If you will please account for this, we can proceed.

Lamar Inosanto
Attorney at Law
 
Kalek_HanneDate: Tuesday, 03 Nov 2009, 11:28 AM | Message # 5
Private
Group: Users
Messages: 7
Awards: 0
Reputation: -1
Status: Offline
The officialy position of the Corellian Government is they will accept the terms of the Resolution if they have to, which at the time of the submission of the Corellian vote on the matter, they believed they would have to or face confrontation from yet another element of opposition. However, while reviewing the Resolution, the Corellian Government's judicial branch advised the leadership that there may be violations of Planetary Rights and the Common Charter in the Resolution and its enforcement, thus we are seeking the injunction and asking the Courts to review this Resolution, as we are now of the belief that this may be an illegal piece of legislation.

The confusion in the matter is reasonable, Your Honor, however it merely stems, on our side as well, as trying to keep up with the fast pace of the debate on the Resolution (A surprising two day affair), and what updates the Corellian Government could get in, and out. Senator Karath was merely not aware of the change in policy at the time of his submission.

To clarify, it is the stance of the Corellian Government that the Resolution is an illegal action that violates Planetary Rights under the Common Charter.

 
Lamar_InosantoDate: Wednesday, 04 Nov 2009, 12:59 PM | Message # 6
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 22
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Very well, the injunction is issued. The New Republic is not to enforce the resolution until its legality has been determined in court. However, because of the importance of this matter—literally, lives are in the balance—I will expect the arguments in this case to proceed quickly. Therefore, please make sure your case is in order. The New Republic is also advised to designate a legal representative in this matter and be prepared to defend the resolution in court. The proceedings will begin presently.

Lamar Inosanto
Attorney at Law


Message edited by Lamar_Inosanto - Wednesday, 04 Nov 2009, 1:01 PM
 
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Search:


Copyright MyCorp © 2025
Create a free website with uCoz