I believe my views on this subject are sound, and have been covered quiet well. Surely there is a subject/issue other than defense someone wishes to ask me about? Like I said, I am a statesman, not a military officer, and defense is not by expertise. As for Senator Tiure, KFC would be more than welcome to set up shop in Tapani Sector, although we may review some menu items for health/moral reasons. As for the Corpse Trade, at this time, unless persuaded otherwise, by the delegates f this chamber or our people, we will not participate in the act. I thank Senator Cerra for her support.

I do see there are some benefits, in the immediate timeframe. However, I must be cautionary here, and feel free to call me skidish, for it is in my nature now considering the state of the Tapani Sector. However, my gut tells me more time is needed for an accurate result. I feel that some of the prosperity seen in the report, could still be pre-defense cut numbers, thus showing no decline. I also believe a trial period should have been applied on this half-pay proposal, as while work is being completed now, what is to say the job market will be so open and widespread in the future? Whats to say these jobs being completed aren't merely sidejobs, say redoing the duracrete-work outside your home, that have merely been put off, and once finished, these servicemen will have no other job to take. I merely believe in-depth study should have been done in this program before its application, and that more time should be given before a conclusive decision on its success or failure is given. So to respond to your question, and I may have overgone your asked two hundred word limit here, I am currently neutral on the matter, awaiting further time for more in-depth, and clearer, results.

What advice would you give to Nute and Pors in these circumstances? What contracts would exist? (if any) And what would be the best steps they could take to resolve this? (within or without the legal framework).