MainMy profileRegistrationLog outLogin
Monday
6.1.2025
12:34 PM
| RSS Main
[New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Archive - read only
Corellia v. New Republic
Lamar_InosantoDate: Sunday, 08 Nov 2009, 1:47 PM | Message # 1
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 22
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
The court is now in session to determine the constitutionality of the Twin Worlds resolution, recently passed by the Senate. Mr. Hanne will go first, then the representative of the New Republic, and each will be allowed a rebuttal. I will ask questions of both sides before delivering the verdict. Mr. Hanne, please present your case.

Added (06 Nov 2009, 2:48 Pm)
---------------------------------------------
Mr. Hanne, you have 48 hours to present your case or it will be dismissed.

Added (08 Nov 2009, 2:47 Pm)
---------------------------------------------
The case is dismissed, and the injunction withdrawn. Mr. Hanne will not be fined, but he is found in contempt of court and formally reprimanded for wasting the court's time on a matter of supreme importance, while people have been losing their lives. This is as irresponsible for a lawyer as it is for any compassionate being, and it does not speak well of Corellia's sincerity or commitment to this case. If at any time it becomes apparent that seeking an injunction was merely a delaying tactic, as one can only suspect, the High Court reserves the right to pursue charges and penalties against Corellia at that time. That is all, gentlemen.


Lamar Inosanto
Attorney at Law


Message edited by Lamar_Inosanto - Sunday, 08 Nov 2009, 1:48 PM
 
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Search:


Copyright MyCorp © 2025
Create a free website with uCoz