|
Research Project Request
|
|
| Havoc | Date: Tuesday, 21 Apr 2009, 7:51 PM | Message # 16 |
 Lieutenant general
Group: Users
Messages: 539
Status: Offline
| Just to clarify, I was using the Phase I armor as a general conception as to what Phase Zero parts would look like. And front line combat? What are you, nuts? No way would I ever approve some copycat version of the SS Death Trooper (Or super trooper) in Star Wars. Only as Black Ops. MOTION TO DENY
|
| |
| |
| WolframKonig | Date: Tuesday, 21 Apr 2009, 10:03 PM | Message # 17 |
 Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 26
Status: Offline
| Thus, you see why I was wanting seperate project. The Phase Zeros essentially just allow old or wounded soldiers to fight once more, adding load of experience to the PA's ground forces. They would have some heightened abilities over standard troops, since this would just optimize normal human abilities, thus their occassional use as shocktroops when needed. The Death Hunters are indeed somewhat of super soldiers, and were only going to be used in a special operations capacity, never front line, unless Eriadu, the Research Ship, or their surface training facilities (something that will, should they be approved, come about at a later date) was under attack...or a world they just happened to be on was under attack. I think I've repeated this in some form or fashion several times, and there would be alot less confusion here if people actually read the words written rather than skim them...or research the exact item at hand, since this was possible in this case, rather than a general overreaching topic. I was very specific when I said Phase Zero Darktroopers...and yet I feel some people still don't quiet understand what the hell I mean...
Grand Moff Wolfram Konig
Pentastar Alignment
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Wednesday, 22 Apr 2009, 9:30 AM | Message # 18 |
 Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| You're right that you have "repeated this in some form or fashion several times," which is why I'm against it, and why I've recieved more than one complaint about the idea from members. For that reason and reasons already stated, I'm disinclined to approve of any sort of enhanced soldiers for combat roles. Enhanced assassins and bounty hunters, of sorts, yes. But supersoldiers, no. In that sense, I agree completely with Echuu's earlier comments. Jace Varitek
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| EchuuShinzon | Date: Wednesday, 22 Apr 2009, 10:31 PM | Message # 19 |
 Lieutenant colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 145
Status: Offline
| To clarify, what I think the good Pentastar Alignment leader is trying to say is that he wants to create supersoldiers as a type of "clone-commander" (referring to the special unit from the Star Wars: Battlefront games) which would spearhead most squads. Regardless, I'm still firmly against it, and for that matter, against any supersoldier project (unless of course the project is supposed to be stopped or halted and not finished according to some bizarre plot twist). We don't need Captain America winning World War II on his own--although that would have been nice.
[+]--[+]--[+]--[+]--[+]--[+]--[+]--[+]--[+]
Echuu Shinzon
Ex-Jedi
Human
Message edited by EchuuShinzon - Wednesday, 22 Apr 2009, 10:32 PM |
| |
| |
| Jory_Carson | Date: Sunday, 26 Apr 2009, 7:08 PM | Message # 20 |
 Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 317
Status: Offline
| I think that we can all agree that this request is formally DENIED in its entirety. If you wish to resubmit then we will be happy to review it ONE TOPIC AT A TIME; meaning that, as in the old MSN version of AGW, if you want to request several things, do it one at a time, and space them out. Don’t go posting three requests in one day…or week for that matter.
|
| |
| |
