Length: 1650 Meters
Maximum Acceleration: 2,400 g
MGLT: 60 MGLT
Engines: 6 Creveld-4 Radial Ion Drives
Hyperdrive Rating: Class 15 (Backup: 15)
Main Reactor: Hypermatter Annihilator
Shielding: Roughly Equivilent to that of a Victory I class Star Destroyer
Hull: Equivilent to that of a Venator class Star Destroyer
Navigation: Equipped Navicomputer

Armament:
6- of the weapons you describe above, 180 degree forward arcing mounted guns, 16 inch barrel diameter. Have to be manually reloaded after each shot. In two groups of three guns.
3- of the same, rear mounted, 180 degrees

10- Medium dual turbolaser cannons
45- point-defense laser cannons
6- Tractor Beam Projectors
6- Heavy Proton Torpedo tubes (16 torpedoes each)

Complement:
24- Alpha 3 Nimbus-class V-wings
36- TIE fighters
50- MMPs
11- MAT-29 Razorbacks
9- MPCs
400 Marines (included in passenger count)
Various Shuttles
Prefabricated Garrison base

Passengers: 2,400 maximum, depending on configuration
Cargo Capacity: 15,000 tons
Consumables: 3 years

It's my understanding that these are the final modifications necessary to be in compliance with all of the new regulations.

Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:

Momentum and weight, therefore, should not be said to make too much of a difference here. Unfortunately, this means that the armor-piercing and depleted uranium projectiles are going to be essentially useless against shields (also, while depleted uranium is one of the densest metals we know of, my rule of thumb is that Star Wars technology, generally, is always superior to what we have in the real world and, thus, there are metals far denser than this. We don't know what these Star Wars metals are, and we don't really need to, either).

The explosive-tipped projectile, then, is the only one I can see being used practically against Star Wars shielding, and this is really only because of the explosive tip which, as you say, is about the power of a couple of turbolaser blasts. In other words, it's a big proton torpedo with a lot of thrust to it. As I said, I suspect the thrust doesn't make a lot of difference in terms of the damage it does, but it would, of course, be useful in making it harder to shoot down than an average proton torpedo. There's a potential problem though even with the propulsion; that is to say, the tibanna gas. As a highly flammable and unstable gas that has rather narrow applications (I won't get into them here, this post is complicated enough), I think it would be hard to burn it as fuel for propulsion without simply blowing it all up. But! There is hope for this, too. We know that there are many different methods of propulsion in Star Wars, even if we don't necessarily know what they are. Personally, I'm fine not knowing what it is. As long as you say "it's a self-propelled projectile," that's adequate to me. A lot of Star Wars technology, after all, works solely on the basis of saying "this works," without going into detail.

And so we come full circle. That is, the benefit of Star Wars simply saying "this works"—unlike other films, like 2001, and TV shows like the original Star Trek, which were researched down to every scientific detail—is that it avoids having to do what I've done; research this a lot. You can go into that detail if you want, of course, and sometimes it is necessary, but be advised you generally don't have to and, when you do, you run the risk of having a technology, like this one, that doesn't seem to be applicable to Star Wars based on what we do know of it. Therefore, since certain aspects of this technology apparently need to be modified now anyway, I would suggest modifying them to simply say "they work," without elaborating how more than you have to. Easier for me, easier for you. Duff Beer for me, Duff Beer for you. I'll have a Duff, you'll have one too.

Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee: