MainMy profileRegistrationLog outLogin
Saturday
4.1.2025
2:01 AM
| RSS Main
[New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Archive - read only
Request for castle defenses
Alyn_StarkDate: Tuesday, 25 Oct 2011, 10:49 PM | Message # 1
Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Awards: 2
Reputation: 1
Status: Offline
Sorry for putting out so many defenses. I'm trying to get the character and his assets up into full working order.

Ok, for this request, please refer to the description here. While it does not cover his actual living quarters and castle, it covers the fortress area of sorts that is the seat of the Kinyov Province.

Requesting for The Portal:

Requesting for The Passage:

Requesting for The Waypoint:

Request for The Breaker:

Request for The Summit:


Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
 
OrionKarathDate: Wednesday, 26 Oct 2011, 9:44 PM | Message # 2
Lieutenant general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 612
Awards: 1
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
APPROVE

Orion Karath
Manager from June 2009 to Present, Administrator from December 2011 to Present
My posts here, pre-2009 archives here
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Thursday, 27 Oct 2011, 12:07 PM | Message # 3
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
The Portal
APPROVE:
3 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (one mounted on each tower and one above the gatehouse.
4 DF.9 Anti-infantry battery (two on either side of the gatehouse, placed at the base of either tower
2 Particle cannon turret (two mounted per parapet)
DENY:
2 Particle cannon turret (two mounted per parapet)

The Passage
APPROVE:
3 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)
2 Air defense tower (mounted atop rearmost two towers)
2 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (mounted atop foremost two towers)
4 DF.9 Anti-infantry battery (two per either side of main gate)
12 V-19 landspeeder (motor pool housed)
14 A-A5 heavy speeder truck (motor pool housed)
2 TX-130 Saber-class fighter tank (motor pool housed)
12 T-47 Airspeeder
DENY:
14 A-A5 heavy speeder truck (motor pool housed)
24 Seraph-class urban landspeeder (motor pool housed)
12 V-19 landspeeder (motor pool housed)
48 BARC Speeder (motor pool housed)
12 K-222 Aero-interceptor
4 VAAT/e

The Waypoint
APPROVE:
2 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)
2 Air defense tower (mounted atop towers flanking gate)
2 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (mounted along wall, near towers)
DENY:
2 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)

The Breaker
APPROVE:
1 FPC 6.7 Anti-aircraft battery (mounted atop tower)
2 DF.9 Anti-infantry battery (two per either side of main gate)
10 BARC Speeder (motor pool housed)
DENY:
3 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)

The Summit
APPROVE:
2 FPC 6.7 Anti-aircraft battery (mounted along wall)
8 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)
2 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (mounted along wall, near gate)


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Alyn_StarkDate: Thursday, 27 Oct 2011, 11:33 PM | Message # 4
Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Awards: 2
Reputation: 1
Status: Offline
If I might ask, why the denial off all the anti-infantry weapons (namely the particle turrets) on the gatehouses?

The speeder trucks are utilized to assist and aid in carrying supplies across the desert to the more remote communities, and the landspeeders and BARC bikes are used to keep order on the ground; if you noted I said that many of the police and peacekeeping forces utilize that particular spot as their base. I'm willing to cut back on the VAAT's to 2, if that's ok, but if possible I'd like to field 6 airspeeders and 6 of the interceptors.


Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Friday, 28 Oct 2011, 9:32 AM | Message # 5
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
I missed these, from the "Summit":

DENY 4 of the particle cannon turrets.

And if it's the case that the trucks are used for the purposes of transport then, as has traditionally been the case, you needn't request them. (That said, I did approve the speeder trucks, or meant to. The fact they appeared in the approve and deny columns simultaneously was my bad, I'll fix that).

As for my reasoning here, you've requested a castle that's impervious to everything but orbital bombardment (thus rather inviting orbital bombardment, but I digress). My emphasis on the particle cannons is because they're versatile weapons that can be employed equally, or more or less equally, against infantry and armor and air vehicles, thus thinning their number is intended to make the castle only somewhat less impervious while leaving abundantly intact its ability to blow up pretty much anything that wanders near it. Bear in mind you've also requested (or mentioned elsewhere, at least) over 1,000 troops defending this castle on a permanent basis; the ability of these troops in fortified positions to deter infantry shouldn't be understated especially if they have E-Webs and other specifically anti-infantry weapons, which I think are adequate in place of the more multi-purpose particle slaughterguns.

And as for the speeder bikes, I left intact what I think is a sufficient number of them in the "Breaker." 10 speeder bikes for recon and rapid response seems adequate to me on top of the trucks and the V-19 landspeeders already approved. Certainly over 50 of them is more than adequate. I suppose I was a bit reluctant to see multiple motor pools of speeder bikes throughout the compound when one should be enough, considering the point of a speeder bike is its mobility.

My reasoning on the VAAT's is more or less the same as above. But I loosened up and went with 1 (see my edited list).

Finally, with regard to the A-222 interceptors, I just felt there should be something this castle can't do, and the ability to engage enemy fighters in one-on-one combat is what I went with. I was also thinking ahead to the probability that Stark is going to have ships at some point rather soon and that it'd be reasonable if he wants better air cover for his castle to use one or more of his ships for this purpose.


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Friday, 28 Oct 2011, 9:44 AM | Message # 6
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
Okay, crap. Turns out I can't edit the list without the code going all funky. So...

The Portal
APPROVE:
3 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (one mounted on each tower and one above the gatehouse.
4 DF.9 Anti-infantry battery (two on either side of the gatehouse, placed at the base of either tower
2 Particle cannon turret (two mounted per parapet)
DENY:
2 Particle cannon turret

The Passage
APPROVE:
3 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)
2 Air defense tower (mounted atop rearmost two towers)
2 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (mounted atop foremost two towers)
4 DF.9 Anti-infantry battery (two per either side of main gate)
12 V-19 landspeeder (motor pool housed)
14 A-A5 heavy speeder truck (motor pool housed)
2 TX-130 Saber-class fighter tank (motor pool housed)
12 T-47 Airspeeder
1 VAAT/e
DENY:
14 A-A5 heavy speeder truck (motor pool housed)
24 Seraph-class urban landspeeder (motor pool housed)
12 V-19 landspeeder (motor pool housed)
48 BARC Speeder (motor pool housed)
12 K-222 Aero-interceptor
3 VAAT/e

The Waypoint
APPROVE:
2 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)
2 Air defense tower (mounted atop towers flanking gate)
2 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (mounted along wall, near towers)
DENY:
2 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)

The Breaker
APPROVE:
1 FPC 6.7 Anti-aircraft battery (mounted atop tower)
2 DF.9 Anti-infantry battery (two per either side of main gate)
10 BARC Speeder (motor pool housed)
DENY:
3 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)

The Summit
APPROVE:
2 FPC 6.7 Anti-aircraft battery (mounted along wall)
4 Particle cannon turret (mounted atop the gatehouse)
2 Bp.4 Anti-vehicle turret (mounted along wall, near gate)
DENY:
4 particle cannon turrets (mounted atop the gatehouse)


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Alyn_StarkDate: Friday, 28 Oct 2011, 9:49 PM | Message # 7
Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Awards: 2
Reputation: 1
Status: Offline
My apologies for this being such a long one; and this is more than acceptable. Thank you kindly, Jace.

Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Friday, 28 Oct 2011, 9:59 PM | Message # 8
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
Hey, no problem. I appreciate you linking to the Wookieepedia pages. You sure this is okay, though? To be honest I was prepared to haggle some more.

Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Alyn_StarkDate: Friday, 28 Oct 2011, 10:06 PM | Message # 9
Generalissimo
Group: Users
Messages: 1359
Awards: 2
Reputation: 1
Status: Offline
Well, you do have a point. It -is- an awful lot to ask for; albeit my castle/fortress/living thing was rather expansive, and I have yet to even detail his home itself. those are sort of the steps and the doorway into it. I suppose at some point I'll have to get some sort of ships for him to use, and there are the R&L products I'll have to request that are mentioned in the Communications board and such, so it's more than fair. A few turrets and a few less speeders and no K-222's (even though they are kinda cool, :P) are more than reasonable for me to give up.

Alyn Stark
Lord of Kinyov
Senior Captain, Retired, Republic Navy
Head of House Malos (former)
Licensed bounty hunter
Majority shareholder, Lorrd Engineering
Owner, Stark Defense Conglomerate
Civilian Medal of Honor recipient
Representative, Lorrd (10 BBY-9 BBY)
 
Karth_DeQoraDate: Friday, 28 Oct 2011, 10:11 PM | Message # 10
Colonel general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1157
Awards: 1
Reputation: 17
Status: Offline
APPROVE, THEN?

Man, Myth, Administrative God. Also plays a mean kazoo.
Jace Varitek: In Northern California we just have gangs of vigilante interior decorators.
 
Karth_DeQoraDate: Sunday, 30 Oct 2011, 8:11 PM | Message # 11
Colonel general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1157
Awards: 1
Reputation: 17
Status: Offline
APPROVED, THEN.

Man, Myth, Administrative God. Also plays a mean kazoo.
Jace Varitek: In Northern California we just have gangs of vigilante interior decorators.
 
  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1
Search:


Copyright MyCorp © 2025
Create a free website with uCoz