|
Eclipse Pirate Request
|
|
| Savrek_Eclipse | Date: Saturday, 03 Mar 2012, 10:19 PM | Message # 1 |
 Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 29
Status: Offline
| I'd like to request a Modified CR90 Corvette under the Command of Savrek Eclipse for the Eclipse Pirates
CR90 corvette
Production information
Manufacturer: Corellian Engineering Corporation
Product line: CR Series
Model: CR90 Corvette
Class: Corvette
Technical specifications
Length: 150m
Width: 48.6m
Height/Depth: 32.6m (Including upper communications antenna)
Maximum acceleration: 2,670G
MGLT: 76 MGLT
Maximum speed (Atmosphere): 1209 km/h
Engine unit(s): Girodyne Ter58 high-output ion turbine engines (14, in trireme configuration) {3 Added to increase speed)
Hyperdrive rating: Class 1.0
Hyperdrive system: CEC subspace hyperdrive
Power planet: Maso-Branger 7085 Ionization Reactor and Regulator
Shielding: Equipped
Sensor systems: Military Grade Sensor Unit
Navigation system: Corellian Chain Management NavCom Unit (26640 limited non-Ai processing)
Armament
x2 Dual Turbolaser Turrets
x4 Single Turbolaser Turrets
x2 Concussion Missile Launchers (x5 each)
(Payload x20 Concussion Missiles)
Escape craft
x8 Emergency Escape Pods (Ventral)
x4 Armed Maximum Capacity Life ships (Dorsal)
Crew: 75
Minimum Crew: 18
Passengers: 100
Cargo capacity: 2,500 Metric Tons
Consumables: 1 Year
x2 GAT-12g Skipray Blastboats
x2 Z-95ML Headhunters
x4 Z-95-AF4 Headhunters
Eclipse Pirates
x75 (Full CR90 Crew Compliment)
x10 (Full Skipray Blastboat Compliments {5 crew each})
x6 (Full Headhunter Crew Compliments)
Eclipse Pirates Total
x91 Crew
Savrek Eclipse
Eclipse Anti-Alien League
Message edited by Savrek_Eclipse - Monday, 05 Mar 2012, 9:41 PM |
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2012, 6:21 PM | Message # 2 |
 Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| I have to DENY the Skiprays, I'm afraid. I don't have a problem with you having them except that, as I recall, in this time period there's only a handful of Star Destroyers that actually use them (they never see standard or widespread adoption). At this point I'm doubtful there'd be many of them, if any, outside of the Imperial Navy. Later on? Sure. But not in 10 BBY, I don't think. I APPROVE of everything else provided the number of concussion missiles on the CR90 is reduced. From 20 to 10, perhaps? It says there's 2 launchers with 5 missiles each, so it should be 10 anyway, right? (Bear in mind, also, that the Z-95's have missiles too, especially the ML's. We'll need to decide on how many missiles the ML's have, incidentally; I'm thinking 4 each?).
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| Savrek_Eclipse | Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2012, 6:48 PM | Message # 3 |
|
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 29
Status: Offline
| I can agree with that.
So,
x1 CR90 w/ 10 missile payload
x2 Z-95MLs w/4 missiles each
x4 Z-95AF4
Savrek Eclipse
Eclipse Anti-Alien League
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2012, 6:53 PM | Message # 4 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| Yepper.
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2012, 10:33 PM | Message # 5 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| Quick caveat that I forgot, though. In the past we've generally insisted that newly approved ships not be used in conflicts that are in-progress in the RP. Same as the rule about new senators not being able to vote on bills that are already in-progress, too. So in other words, while I'm still okay with this, it shouldn't be used in the Chandaar conflict.
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
| Savrek_Eclipse | Date: Tuesday, 13 Mar 2012, 8:07 PM | Message # 6 |
|
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 29
Status: Offline
| understood
Added (13 Mar 2012, 8:07 PM)
---------------------------------------------
Just a real quick edit I'd like to make to the weapons load out as follows.
Armament
x2 Dual Turbolaser Turrets
x2 Single Turbolaser Turrets
x2 Single Ion Cannon Turrets
x2 Concussion Missile Launchers (x5 each)
(Payload x10 Concussion Missiles)
Just changing out 2 of the Single Turbolaser Turrets for 2 Ion Cannon turrets
Savrek Eclipse
Eclipse Anti-Alien League
Message edited by Savrek_Eclipse - Tuesday, 13 Mar 2012, 8:09 PM |
| |
| |
| OrionKarath | Date: Tuesday, 13 Mar 2012, 11:31 PM | Message # 7 |
 Lieutenant general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 612
Status: Offline
| APPROVE
You're the unlucky one to feel my wraith here, and by wraith I mean a statement, and by statement I mean a sentence. I wanted to drag that out more, but I lost the creative spirit to make a page of that continuous downward explanation.
Anyways; for future reference, for simplicity's sake, I would like to ask that, and this kind of goes for everyone as a public statement that is just to occurring in this particular request, that member's please ensure all details and aspects of their request be posted first and foremost. It will help us respond and judge in a more expeditious and efficient fashion, as well as not requiring multiple re-votes on a request. I refer to, specifically "Oh, wait, I want to add this!" or "Hey, now that you've almost all approved this, how about this modification too?", this is a trend I would like to not see develop into a dominant occurrence. Of course, there are some mild exceptions, such as aspects one may not want to reveal due to plot devices or worry of OOC manipulation. Okay, that was more than a sentence. Jaron rant/done.
Orion Karath
Manager from June 2009 to Present, Administrator from December 2011 to Present
My posts here, pre-2009 archives here
|
| |
| |
| Jace_Varitek | Date: Wednesday, 14 Mar 2012, 5:48 PM | Message # 8 |
|
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Status: Offline
| APPROVED.
The addition of ion cannons is a reasonable afterthought, I think. But of course it would be nice if all requests looked like this. But meh, we've seen worse. (And worser. Why do the tedious ones always have to do with the Chiss?)
Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here
"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes
Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
|
| |
| |
