|
The Ryloth Rescue Act
|
|
| Jamie_the_Hutt | Date: Monday, 17 May 2010, 2:09 AM | Message # 16 |
 Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 392
Status: Offline
| I believe they may be in this fashion. This INDENTURE Witnesseth that ______________ (full name) a _________ (occupation) doth Voluntarily put himself Servant to _______________________ (Name of Employing Corporation/Individual/Collective) to serve the said _______________________ (Name of Employing Corporation/Individual/Collective) and his/its Assigns, for and during the full Space, Time and Term of five Years from the first Day of the said ____________ (full name)'s arrival at _____________ (Starport) on New Ryloth, during which Time or Term the said Master or his Assigns shall and will find and supply the said individual with sufficient Meat, Drink, Apparel, Lodging and all other necessaries befitting such a Servant in addition to a fair share of the Harvest, and at the end and expiration of said Term, the said individual to be made Free, and receive according to the Custom of New Ryloth. Provided nevertheless, and these Presents are on this Condition, that if the said individual shall pay the said employer or his Assigns 25,000 Credits, New Republic in twenty one Days after his arrival he shall be Free, and the above Indenture and every Clause therein, absolutely Void and of no Effect. In Witness whereof the said Parties have hereunto interchangeably put their Hands and Seals the ______________ (date of signing) in the Presence of __________________ (duly appointed legal witness) and ________________ (representative of employer).
Message edited by Jamie_the_Hutt - Wednesday, 19 May 2010, 7:23 PM |
| |
| |
| Johannes_Oswaldt | Date: Monday, 17 May 2010, 4:37 AM | Message # 17 |
 Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 250
Status: Offline
| Slander and calumny! Emperor Gavrisom, I demand that Senator Forte be called to order for implying that my remark—"Only the people of Ryloth could possibly be dumb enough to live on Ryloth"—was speciesist in any manner. It was not. It was a commentary on the intellect of any individual who would choose to live on so wretched a planet as Ryloth, regardless of that individual's species. To call this speciesist is slander, which I would hope the Chief of State does not tolerate in his Senate. Furthermore, Senator Tiure's contract seems reasonable to me. I wonder, is there any possibility that the Senator might expand his program to include Eriadu as well as Ryloth? I regret to say that certain varieties of my world's population live in poor, blighted neighborhoods which, because of certain Republic regulations, I am prohibited from demolishing in favor of new developments, foundries, etc. while people continue to reside there. But I'm sure many of these people might be interested in a contract of the sort you are proposing for Ryloth.
Johannes Oswaldt
Senator and Governor of Eriadu
|
| |
| |
| Tremaine_Fowlkes | Date: Wednesday, 19 May 2010, 10:55 AM | Message # 18 |
 Colonel general
Group: Users
Messages: 881
Status: Offline
| I ask Chief of State to have Senator Oswaldt be called to order for calling him Emperor. Must I remind you that this is not the Galactic Empire, Senator Oswaldt? What's the motive behind attempting to expand The Ryloth Rescue Act to Eriadu? I apologize, but why would Senator Forte want to put his trust in the optional relocation of the Twi'leks on Ryloth in hands of Senator Oswaldt? To have Senator Tiure propose something like this is one thing, but to have Senator Oswaldt wanting to include Eriadu in this program is another. You just admitted that Eriadu is not the suitable place for the natives of Ryloth. Once again, what's your motives behind this? I also stand by my vote, once again providing that Senator Forte has no objections on this.
Tremaine Fowlkes
Senator of Telos IV
|
| |
| |
| Cul-utaanForte | Date: Wednesday, 19 May 2010, 4:06 PM | Message # 19 |
|
Colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 150
Status: Offline
| I will not support slavery, as Senator Tiure does. I will not support endentured servitude, as Senator Tiure does. If I my people wish to seek residency and work off-world, they already have the means to do so, that isn't being enslaved by the Hutts. I vote AGAINST this legislation.
General Cul'utaan'forte
Forte's Legion
|
| |
| |
| Jamie_the_Hutt | Date: Wednesday, 19 May 2010, 7:25 PM | Message # 20 |
|
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 392
Status: Offline
| Maybe Senator Forte has not read the contract. Which, we must understand is a necessary part of being a reactionary. In what particulars does he object to the Contract? Is it just that he has read the word Indenture? Or is it that there is something actually objectionable within the contract?
|
| |
| |
| Ponc_Gavrisom | Date: Wednesday, 19 May 2010, 7:27 PM | Message # 21 |
|
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 271
Status: Offline
| Senator Oswaldt, Senator Forte, you are both requested to calm your tempers and debate in a calm manner, and not to use Unparliamentry language. I am sure Governor Oswaldt was mistaken in addressing me as Emperor.
Ponc Gavrisom
Chief of State
|
| |
| |
| Johannes_Oswaldt | Date: Wednesday, 19 May 2010, 7:54 PM | Message # 22 |
|
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 250
Status: Offline
| I misspoke. And Senator Fowlkes, you have misunderstood me. I don't want anything to do with Ryloth. I asked Senator Tiure if certain persons from Eriadu could agree to the Senator's contract as well as persons from Ryloth. There's nothing sinister in this, and I object to the suggestion that there is.
Johannes Oswaldt
Senator and Governor of Eriadu
|
| |
| |
| Cul-utaanForte | Date: Saturday, 22 May 2010, 11:37 PM | Message # 23 |
|
Colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 150
Status: Offline
| I object to the contract itself. I will not allow the New Republic to sanction any program that involves contractual obligations to work
General Cul'utaan'forte
Forte's Legion
|
| |
| |
| Ponc_Gavrisom | Date: Thursday, 27 May 2010, 12:26 PM | Message # 24 |
|
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 271
Status: Offline
| Acting pragmatically, I vote in favour of this motion, although it may be controversial it provides an escape for Ryloth Citizens from Ryloth, there is always appeal to the courts if this motion causes a breach of the law. Added (27 May 2010, 1:26 PM)
---------------------------------------------
This motion passes with three votes against, and five in favour.
Ponc Gavrisom
Chief of State
|
| |
| |
