|
Rookite Rebellion OOC
|
|
| Mr_Goodchild | Date: Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 1:21 AM | Message # 1 |
 Lieutenant colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 111
Status: Offline
| Okay, I've got to ask that a manager come in and take a look at the missiles that are flying around. I've got to say that the number being thrown out is just way to much in terms of payload that a fighter could carry.
Also need to call into question this line.
(meaning it would be struck by 60 missiles inside 30 seconds)
Mr. Goodchild
Minister of State
Representative of the Cronese Mandate
Message edited by Mr_Goodchild - Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 1:27 AM |
| |
| |
| Protector_Krenn | Date: Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 1:29 AM | Message # 2 |
 Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 33
Status: Offline
| Each Z-95 has 2 Concussion missile launchers.
Assuming 5 missiles per launcher (theyre smaller than Proton torpedos and an N1 carries 5 of them per tube despite being much smaller).
So far the fighters have fired 2 pairs of missiles each (1 pair at the Nebulon B except a few at the bombers, 1 pair at the super freighter) - leaving each fighter with 3 concussion missiles per tube left.
As for the number of missiles - 30 fighters, 2 tubes each, one missile per tube fired, 60 missiles.
Larkin Krenn
________________
Protector of Caluula
Message edited by Protector_Krenn - Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 1:30 AM |
| |
| |
| Mr_Goodchild | Date: Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 1:30 AM | Message # 3 |
|
Lieutenant colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 111
Status: Offline
| No offense Jamie, but you seem to have this knack for pushing things too far when there's a large gray area such as a vessel saying it has missile launchers, and not giving it an exact amount of missiles. I'd prefer to hear from a manager on this.
Mr. Goodchild
Minister of State
Representative of the Cronese Mandate
|
| |
| |
| Protector_Krenn | Date: Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 2:11 AM | Message # 4 |
|
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 33
Status: Offline
| What do you feel would be a reasonable number per launcher? Just curious..
X-Wing Alliance gives the number as 4 per tube as per TFHB.
Larkin Krenn
________________
Protector of Caluula
|
| |
| |
| Mr_Goodchild | Date: Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 2:15 AM | Message # 5 |
|
Lieutenant colonel
Group: Users
Messages: 111
Status: Offline
| Personally, I think 5 is pushing it too much. To me 3 per tube is a fair middle ground. Like I said though, I'd like a manager to weigh in so we have something more definite.
And also, lets give it a pause for a moment and let Rook post at least, he is the one who started the entire rebellion/rise up thing.
Mr. Goodchild
Minister of State
Representative of the Cronese Mandate
Message edited by Mr_Goodchild - Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 2:16 AM |
| |
| |
| Protector_Krenn | Date: Thursday, 02 Feb 2012, 2:22 AM | Message # 6 |
|
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 33
Status: Offline
| Ok
Larkin Krenn
________________
Protector of Caluula
|
| |
| |
