Or meets infrequently, or simply isn't good at what it does. I don't want to cause a Jaronesque conundrum whereby some previously-unknown fact is used to trump your bill; I'd be content to diminish the role or efficacy of the Moff Council if you'd like. This wouldn't change the argument, however, that Moffs working this out among themselves is presumably preferable to the bureaucracy of the Senate (as this very Senate debate would suggest). That's the crux of Cambrist's argument, Moff Council or no.Added (03 Feb 2013, 12:26 PM)
---------------------------------------------
The mandate of the Moff Council is pretty ambiguous anyway. "to encourage uniformity of inter-sector regulations."
