MainMy profileRegistrationLog outLogin
Friday
4.7.2025
12:15 PM
| RSS Main
[New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
  • »
Continuity Issues
Marcus_BralorDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 2:46 AM | Message # 1
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 25
Awards: 1
Reputation: 2
Status: Offline
Last night's episode of the Clone Wars TV show seemed to bring up some continuity issues for the Mandalorians. It introduces a planet called Kalevala, in the Mandalorian system. The capital of this planet, as I understood it, is Sundari. However, the entry for Sundari on Wookieepedia says that it's the capital of Mandalore, not Kalevala. Apparently The Art of Star Wars: The Clone Wars specifically says that Sundari is the capital of Mandalore, but it isn't—Keldabe is and, as far as I know, always has been the capital of that planet. Furthermore, the portrayal of Sundari and the surrounding terrain looks nothing like any depiction of Mandalore that I'm aware of.

Moreover, there's a character who is described as the "Duchess of Mandalore," although she seems to reside on Kalevala. Thus, "Duchess of Mandalore" seems less likely to refer to the planet Mandalore (which doesn't have an aristocracy that I'm aware of) as it is to refer to the Mandalore system, especially since she's apparently in charge of something called the "Council of Neutral Systems." But all of this is extremely confusing. Somewhere, Karen Traviss is very pissed off.


Marcus Bralor
Dar'alor be Dar'buir Akaata
("Former General of the Dar'buir Battalion")
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 12:03 PM | Message # 2
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
It's worse than that—Karen Traviss has backed out of writing her next book, citing this reason on her blog: "I was told about a significant continuity change coming up in the Clone Wars cartoon. (As was mentioned and shown in a couple of books that came out in the summer - this is not confidential information of any kind now.) I was told that the Mandalorians were being revamped as long-standing pacifists who'd given up fighting centuries ago and that Mandalore was now a post-apocalyptic wasteland devastated by war. I was told not to refer to (recent) Mandalorian history because of that, as it was obviously at odds with the old continuity in my novels."

What we saw in that episode last night was Mandalore. Apparently, it does have an aristocracy, and they are pacifists. This much we know as of 20 BBY. I hasten to add that we don't know for certain, now, what Mandalore is like as of 20 ABY, our current timeline. Zuthus has argued to me, and I agree with him, that the Empire's enslavement of Mandalore might have brought about a resurgence of the traditional, warrior ways. However, I have to be honest that with this new information it seems unlikely that the "traditionalists," if you will, would be very numerous at this time.

I want to encourage Mandalorian characters to suggest ways that we might reconcile these differences and still keep the current RP going with as few changes to it as possible (some changes, apparently, do seem necessary). For example, Mandalorian "traditionalists" such as Zuthus, Ordo, Mereel and so on could, instead, be headquartered on Concordia, the moon of Mandalore which is lush and green and portrayed in the show as rather traditionalist in its ways. I must emphasize, however, that we probably can't commit firmly to an explanation until the other episodes are played out, and the new changes have been officially retconned.

Nonetheless, I'm curious to hear everyone's (constructive) thoughts on this. I'm sure we can work out something.

Here are some of the problems, as I see them:

■ The planet Mandalore is now seen as a post-apocalyptic wasteland, whereas before it was described as forested.
■ The Mandalorians are described in 20 BBY, predominantly, as pacifists who have given up the old warrior ways.
■ In our plot, the Mandalorians practice slavery. This new portrayal of Mandalorians most likely would not.


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
BairdDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 1:42 PM | Message # 3
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 465
Awards: 2
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline
Screw George Lucas for screwing up a good thing.

Thats my "Constructive" thought.

But like you told me in MSN. I'll keep Baird raised as a traditionalist. Still residing on the Resol'Nare. and what not.


Commander in the Grand Army of the Republic (Former)
Friend of the oppressed.
Liberator of the enthralled.
Damian Baird.
 
Marcus_BralorDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 2:04 PM | Message # 4
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 25
Awards: 1
Reputation: 2
Status: Offline
I agree with Isez. My character will also be fine, I assume, because the Ordos have their own planet that's not in the Mandalorian System at all. Since it doesn't really appear in the canon at all after 3,956 BBY, it concievably could have remained a bastion of traditional culture, resol'nare, etc. The Ordos don't practice slavery either, so that's not a problem for me.

If we do move this "traditionalist" movement away from Mandalore and, instead, on Concordia (or Dxun, as Isez suggested), I think that might be cool, actually. The Mandalorians have always kind of been outcasts, and this way we would go back to that portrayal of them instead of being "the man." Maybe instead of a war against the Remnant, we could instead try to conquer the Mandalorian Sector back from the pacifists? (shouldn't be difficult, lol). One thing we know for sure is that Mandalore doesn't appear in the canon at all during this time period, so it's concievable.

Also, if we do still want to take on the Remnant, we could always do it Inglourious Basterds style.

What does Zuthus think about all this?


Marcus Bralor
Dar'alor be Dar'buir Akaata
("Former General of the Dar'buir Battalion")
 
Cobra_TaipanDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 7:10 PM | Message # 5
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 39
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Mandalorians have always been warriors and to have them as pasicifists makes no sense. and like I said in msn in order to do this they would have to re write the entire history of Mandalore,where it came from and everything about it dating back to the Mandalorian Blockade,sith war,Madalorian war etc. why they need to rewrite something that was written previously I will never know if they want to make storylines,it seems to me it would be better to base it off of what is already known about the back history and then go from there instead of come up with something like this that completely changes the history.

 
Jace_VaritekDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 7:27 PM | Message # 6
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
Okay, I'm liking the way this plan is going. I talked to Isez on Messenger and we've worked out a refined version of what we've been talking about. It goes something like this; by the time of the Clone Wars, the planet Mandalore was devastated by a war of some sort (we don't know what happened, for now). The "New Mandalorians"—pacifists who do not follow the warrior codes, and who believe in neutrality and tolerance—comprise the majority of the Mandalorian people at this time, and they rule the planet. However, the "True Mandalorians," or traditionalists, are a minority who continue to observe the old ways and pass them down. Many of these people are scattered on places like Dxun, Ordo, and Concordia.

We don't (yet) know exactly what happened during the Clone Wars, since this particular story arc in the TV series will be further developed over the next two episodes. Much of what I'm about to write might no longer apply in the coming weeks. But we do know, for now, that Mandalorians such as Alpha-Ø2—known as "Mandalore the Resurrector"—and Fenn Shysa were instrumental in revitalizing the old traditions and joining the Separatists, against the wishes of the "New Mandalorians" who, Wookieepedia suggests, tacitly supported Alpha-Ø2 or, at least, did not oppose him. When the Clone Wars ended, Fenn Shysa returned to Mandalore only to find that its people were being enslaved by the Empire.

According to this suggested version of the story, the "New Mandalorians" and Fenn Shysa's traditionalists—or "True Mandalorians"—would have worked with each other and with the Rebel Alliance to force the Empire off of Mandalore, which they did in 3 ABY. Shysa then traveled to places like Dxun, Ordo, and Concordia, recruited more soldiers to his cause, and waged a campaign against Imperial forces throughout the Sector. Zuthus tells me that, by 5 ABY, the Mandalorian Sector was freed.

The war is over, and thus begins a renewed era of animosity between the peaceful, aristocratic "New Mandalorians," who resume governing the planet Mandalore, and the traditional, warlike "True Mandalorians," who are now spread throughout the Sector but, aside from those few places such as Ordo, Dxun and Concordia, have no control over most of it. Fenn Shysa and the traditionalists would, no doubt, be upset that their sacrifice is not respected by the pacifists, and the pacifists, in turn, would be upset that Shysa has declared himself Mand'alor, or leader, of all the Mandalorian people. Neither one recognizes the other's authority.

This, finally, sets us up for the RP. Fenn Shysa, for whatever reason, has gone on leave, or on a mission, and Zuthus Bralor is the Mand'alor in his absense (this is how it works now, so it should be familiar). Bralor presides over the traditionalist Mandalorians and reunites many of them for a war of conquest—not against the Remnant, as we originally planned, but a war of conquest of the Mandalorian Sector; to Bralor, Marcus Ordo, Isez Baird and the others, it is a question of respect and of governing the planets that they fought to free from the Empire. And so the stage is set for a Mandalorian Civil War.

Isez and Ordo are definitely willing to make this happen. I've also talked to Mr. Cratwright, and he's agreed to RP the Duke of Mandalore—the leader of the pacifist "New Mandalorian" government—if we move ahead with this idea. It remains to be seen what Zuthus thinks of it.

The one major difference here is that Zuthus Bralor's Mandalorians will not have as many ships because they have limited resources and infrastructure. However, if it's a conflict within the Mandalorian Sector (and especially a conflict against pacifists) you really don't need as many ships.

So, how's that sound? Bear in mind, again, that all of this is subject to change on the whims of the next episode of The Clone Wars. This version of events, however, is based on the best information that we have at the moment.


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 7:35 PM | Message # 7
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
Also, I agree with Cobra. It's very unorthodox to change the canon so drastically. Karen Traviss said on her blog that it now requires "massive retcons," which is something I attempted to do in my above post. Either way though, whatever you think about Karen Traviss' portrayal of the Mandalorians (I'm not a fan), it is pretty crappy for LucasBooks to treat one of its authors this way. This sudden change in the portrayal of the Mandalorians, for no compelling reason, seems almost calculated to be the opposite of everything she's written. It looks like a deliberate rebuke of her. It's not nice to do that to one of the few authors in the Star Wars franchise who seems genuinely passionate about the material she writes, and who participates in forums, fan discussions, etc.

I should say former authors in the Star Wars franchise, because she's backed out of writing all of her forthcoming books because the canon discrepancies are too huge to overcome. As she wrote on her blog, "... if I hook you with a story, my part of the deal is to follow through and give you a satisfying outcome. If changes beyond my control mean I can't give you that, then I won't do a half a job. You deserve better than that. And in five, ten, twenty years time, nobody picking up the books will know that the stories suddenly changed direction because the canon changed in the middle of it. They'll just see books that went off-course for no visible reason and didn't deliver what they promised at the start."


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Zuthus_BralorDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 10:28 PM | Message # 8
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 38
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Well honestly I'm disappointed Jace. Karen Traviss was instrumental in the portrayal of Mandalorians as something more then what previous rpers often sited. She was the one that infused more scenes of Family values through out the books which I extended further on.

Now I have alot of views on this. Since Karen Traviss is backing out completely I'm going to suspect the worst. The best thing the new authors can do is still line this up as much as possible with Karen's work. But if the writer in this case is George Lucas then we are going to be fucked. Currently based on the color of these changes the likelihood that I'm going to have revamp my character stats themselves is going to sky rocket. Worst case Alpha 02 and Fenn Shysa will no longer exist. With Karen leaving Star Wars it may go as far as destroying her entire canon. This has yet to be seen. I for one am not going to wait. For convenience I'm going to copy as much of the current Wookieepedia articles as I can to make sure we preserve the old canon for the purpose of this group. Although I doubt the entire canon is going to change itself since alot of side guide books and histories were made.

Although now that I think about it destroying the contunity like this would artificially create the need for new guide books and thus a new market for new information. They could be doing this since they know die hard Star Wars fans are always going to buy new books. Kinda like Apple designs crap because it's trendy.

More thoughts to be continued please hold until then

Added (30 Jan 2010, 11:28 Pm)
---------------------------------------------
Personally though as a Mandalorian I would say Go shove your canon up your arse. I'm going to fight the Remnant as I am now and my planet is as I say it is. For the Glory Mandalore canon issue can go frak themselves. We march on.

 
Jace_VaritekDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 10:30 PM | Message # 9
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
I should clarify, I'm not a fan of her portrayal of the clones. I agree that her portrayal of Mandalorians is a vast improvement on previous incarnations. She also introduced homosexuality into the canon even when most of the LucasBooks people were saying, like Ahmadinejad, that "homosexuality doesn't exist in Star Wars." I think this was admirable of her.

As for your second point, this is why I was sure to mention that constructive input is preferable. We're trying to make the best of a bad situation.


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Zuthus_BralorDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 11:04 PM | Message # 10
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 38
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Well constructive points are hardly appropriate for a situation like this. A well respected author's canon is going to be destroyed. My Mandos' powers are going to shift drastically. If I had this information last year I would have already conquered the pacifist by this point and be moving towards the imperials. Now Karen mention in her blog that she would have had to do extensive Retconning to fix this. Can anyone who reads her books tell me if the books she refers to is during the clone wars era or if something later then that. http://www.karentraviss.com/html/Movingon.htm Anywho given the blog entry it seems to me pointless to come up with any ideas at this point. We really need to know where the real Mandalorians are going to be at the end of this. If the changes are to drastic I suggest we just stick with what we have right now. The kind of reforms I put in has already a built in peace loving Mandalorians. If the changes turn out to be less drastic then what Karen Traviss suggest then we'll go from there.

Hell we may even end keeping the way things are based on the Imperial oppression. As I told Jace before the New Mandalorians look like people that the Imperials would brutally oppress. One only has to look at what happen to Alderaan and Caamas to see the kind of people the empire just loves to crush. And if that ends up being the case the "Traditionalist" Mandalorians would probably reign supreme. For all we know this Retconn, though bad for Traviss is going to be nothing more then a hiccup for our Rp.

I'm not keen on changing the Rp just yet. Most of the Canon we have now about Mandalorians suggest that we are alot more powerful at this time then most factions would care for. Although I do agree if these Newbie Mandalorians who have a bad case of "You're doing it wrong" have as much power as Jace suggest then we need to Rp their conquering to bring the canon more towards Boba's reign as Mandalor which shows clear power during the Vong and post vong era.

Added (31 Jan 2010, 0:04 Am)
---------------------------------------------
Oh I forgot to mention the change in scenery on the planet Mandalore. Since it looks like we are going to have to change the physical scenery I suggest that we take the current description of Mandalore and apply it to Concordia. For Coliquial sake since "Traditionalist" need a planet called Mandalore(since the name is kinda sacred) how about we call Concordia by the name Mandalore because that's what the Traditionalist call it. Everyone else can call it Concordia.

 
Jace_VaritekDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 11:17 PM | Message # 11
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
As I understand it, her novels deal entirely with the Clone Wars era. The last project she was working on, Imperial Commando 2, was set in 19 BBY immediately after the Empire came to power, as was the first Imperial Commando book (which seems to involve the planet Mandalore quite a bit, but I haven't read it so I can't say how exactly it was portrayed).

It is possible that the Imperials would brutally oppress the pacifist "New Mandalorians," but as I also suggested to you, it seems just as likely that they might have cooperated with the Imperials in a most treacherous fashion and, thus, be spared much of the carnage. However, either one of these is speculation on my part, which is why in my version of events (above) I didn't address that era in much detail apart from what we already know about Fenn Shysa, the Rebel Alliance, etc. You are right, however, that we should probably wait for more information before we speculate too much, either way.

As for the Yuuzhan Vong era, I admit—as usual—I'm not familiar with it, but considering the total absense of any mention of Mandalorians for about a decade, including this time period, I'm led to believe that they're not terribly powerful. On the other hand, it does say that under Fenn Shysa's rule (i.e. during our current storyline) the fleet of the Mandalorian Protectors existed primarily to defend the borders of the Mandalore Sector and the people in it, and no more. So it could be that we didn't hear anything about the Mandalorians for that reason.

All of this leads me to one conclusion: the canon as pertains to the Mandalorians is in hopeless disarray. I'm feeling reluctant now about the plan that I proposed—there's too much speculation in it. The alternative, though, is to wait 2 weeks for these next episodes to air (and even then, many of these questions probably still won't be answered). Keeping the RP on hold that long doesn't seem like a desirable option, but on the other hand we can't well continue as we are since this, too, is compromised. What does everyone think about this?


Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 11:19 PM | Message # 12
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
If the traditionalist Mandalorians end up settling on Concordia, and they want to refer to it as "Mandalore," I suppose that's fine although it is somewhat confusing. But wouldn't calling somewhere else "Mandalore" undermine the importance of acquiring the actual Mandalore? For surely, this would be Bralor's top priority.

Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Zuthus_BralorDate: Saturday, 30 Jan 2010, 11:35 PM | Message # 13
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 38
Awards: 0
Reputation: 0
Status: Offline
Tactically it's a waste land what's the point... Sentimental values? I mean yeah there is the iron but most of the sector has that anyways.
 
Jace_VaritekDate: Sunday, 31 Jan 2010, 0:10 AM | Message # 14
Generalissimo
Group: Administrators
Messages: 2245
Awards: 4
Reputation: 21
Status: Offline
Good point. So, what's the plan for now then? Are we putting the RP on hold until we have more information? What does everyone think about this?

Jace Varitek
Manager/Administrator from January 2003 to Present
My recent posts here, pre-2009 archives here

"When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
—John Maynard Keynes

Furthermore, a dancing Wookiee:
 
Fajra_MeravDate: Sunday, 31 Jan 2010, 10:56 AM | Message # 15
Major general
Group: Users
Messages: 258
Awards: 1
Reputation: 11
Status: Offline
Well you guys need to balance things out, I have limited rp time sometimes...but I'm open to making a 'new' Mandalorian as long as my posts aren't too expected. =p

 
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
  • »
Search:


Copyright MyCorp © 2025
Create a free website with uCoz