Mind you, Senator, unless you have questions for Mr. Oriel or amendments to suggest to him, I shall make the determination that you are deliberately wasting the Senate's time and shall invoke section 4.3. As for the proposal to consider this bill line-by-line, as it were, Senator Oriel is right that it is an option to be considered if the bill in its current form does not pass. If it does pass, you might also consider proposing the repeal of those articles that, apparently, you find objectionable.

A reminder though, to all Senators—it is common courtesy, both to the sponsor of a bill as well as to us all and to your people, to explain the reasoning for your vote. Simply voting for or against a measure without explanation is in poor taste, and it begs the possibility that you are voting for or against a measure for personal reasons or, worse, for financial or seditious reasons. I did not mention this when Senator Ray refused to explain what, we must agree, was sound criticism of his logic on the censure of Senator Crion, but it bears mentioning now. With that said, let us now continue and, hopefully, conclude this debate.